We used to run for Coach Gary Truce at SUNY Binghamton a long time ago! We're over a half-century old now (and yikes, many of us are over 65). BUT we still run, bike, ROW, XC ski, walk, and work out! Please join us, whether or not you ran for Gary!
Sunday, January 2, 2011
The Mile Run - The Good and the Bad
I'm not sure why, but I decided to finish 2010 with an indoor mile - the Roger Messenger Memorial Mile at RIT's Gordon Fieldhouse in Rochester, NY, this past Thursday, December 30, 2010. (see me in photo, in 2nd place).
Result? 5:17.62, 2nd place out of a whopping 8 over 40 runners, most of whom were over 50 (2 in their 40s, 5 in their 50s, and one in his 60s).
The bad? Slower than I hoped. In the back of my mind, I thought sub-5:10 was possible, but it just wasn't going to happen. Perhaps a lack of speed workouts (only did three, and two were on the streets as the track was snow-covered. Could also just be the lack of track races. I did a mile time trial in May (5:43), and have not done any track races since then. This fall was all cross country or trail races, ranging from 5k to 8.3 miles.
The good? 3 seconds faster than my 2009 time, which occurred in September 2009. Thus, at 1 year and 3 months older, I ran 3 seconds faster. At our age, I guess if you run faster in one year relative to the previous year, we can't complain. Also good was just getting back on the track and trying to run a bit faster. It hurt, but it was a good experience. Splits were fairly even, as best as I could tell. I think I was 2:39 at the half, so almost dead even halves. I might have been a bit faster at the quarter, but I can' t quite remember the clock. I might have seen 78 or 79 seconds just past the quarter.
Also good is that I will use this as building into next year. With a fresh year, it is easy to start dreaming of a sub-5 again!
Mark
Results below or click on the blog title (scroll down to the Messenger Mile).
http://rochestersummertrack.com/results/WinterHolidayClassic2010.htm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I don't see any bad. 5:17 indoors with very little prep is one heck-of-a time!
Mark continues to be an inspiration.
I'm still a bit disappointed. I thought 5:10 was possible, and was even thinking, "say, if I go through the quarter in 75 or 76 and don't feel terrible, I could potentially try for a sub-5." The truth is that a sub-5 at my age will be quite difficult, although I think it is possible. I think it's going to take a few 30 plus mile weeks at least in the spring, then about 6 to 8 solid weeks of once per week track workouts, plus possibly a couple time trials first. In other words, if I want it, I have to work for it!
Post a Comment